The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, or the Consolidated B-24 Liberator?
4.9 (106) · $ 8.00 · In stock
The Consolidated B-24 Liberator was more advanced and versatile than the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, but we provide a fuller breakdown.
Out of the Big Three WW2 bombers (B-17, B-24, Lancaster), was the Flying Fortress the most redundant?, Page 11
Among allied bomber aircraft in WWII, the B-17 is regarded as highly resistant to battle damage and B-24 more fragile. Are these reputations accurate? - Quora
Finding Lt. Robert Rogers, Pt 2 - DeKalb History Center
Which airplane had more range: The B-17 or the B-24? - Quora
Very Large but Not in Charge: The Story of the Forgotten Douglas XB-19 - autoevolution
What made the B-17 bomber so heavily armed? - Quora
Bowenus – Bob Ike's blog
Why do we hear so much more about the B-17 as compared to the B-24 when the B-24 was built in greater numbers, carried more bombs and had better range? - Quora
Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress Archives - Warfare History Network
The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, or the Consolidated B-24 Liberator?
The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, or the Consolidated B-24 Liberator?
What are the deadly design flaws of the B-17 Flying Fortress? - Quora
B-17 or B-24 Which was better - SASS Wire Saloon - SASS Wire Forum
